Ohio · self-storage lien guide
This is informational, not legal advice. Ohio's self-storage lien statute, Ohio Revised Code Chapter 5322 (Storage Facilities, §§ 5322.01–5322.06), can be amended and reinterpreted; verify every requirement below against the current official code and confirm with your own attorney before you act on it.
Not attorney-reviewed. We wrote this guide directly from the operative text of ORC 5322, pulled verbatim on 12 August 2026 from the official Ohio Revised Code at codes.ohio.gov; it has not been reviewed by a licensed Ohio attorney.
Statutes change. This page reflects our reading of the law as written on 12 August 2026.
Chapter 5322 was last amended by H.B. 33, effective 3 October 2023 (§ 5322.06 enacted; § 5322.01's lead-in conformed). No section has a version after that date. But a bill is currently pending in the General Assembly that would rewrite the enforcement timeline and expand owner liability – it is not law, and we cover it in its own section immediately below, precisely so it doesn't get mistaken for the current rule.
Before anything else: Senate Bill 283 (136th General Assembly) has not passed. It has no effective date and no cosponsors as of the as-introduced text. It sits in the Senate General Government Committee, sponsored by Sen. Tim Schaffer. Everything in this section describes what the bill would do if enacted – not what current Ohio law requires. Nothing below this section describes S.B. 283 as if it were in force; everywhere else on this page, we're describing ORC 5322 as it reads today.
As introduced, S.B. 283 would rewrite several pieces of § 5322.03:
None of this is current law, and we aren't predicting whether or when it will become law. The 136th General Assembly runs through 2026. If you are building or sending an Ohio notice, verify S.B. 283's status before you act – and check again on an ongoing basis, not just once. A 10-day template that's correct today would be non-compliant the day this bill, if it passes as introduced, takes effect.
Ohio's sequence is linear and short. The demand for payment must give not less than ten days after delivery of the notice. 5322.03(C)(5) Advertisement may begin only after that time expires – earliest first publication is Day 11. 5322.03(G) The sale must happen at least fifteen days after the first publication. 5322.03(G) Run the math and the earliest possible sale lands at ≈ Day 26 from notice delivery, on either the newspaper or the commercially-reasonable route.
That's the shortest statutory floor of the states in this series – Texas and Illinois run ≈ 30 days, North Carolina ≈ 45 on a conservative reading. Every one of these figures, Ohio's included, is a floor, not a target: build in margin, don't build to the exact minimum.
There's no statutory pre-notice delinquency gate in Ohio – enforcement opens at "a claim that has become due," and the rental agreement governs when that happens. 5322.03 One wrinkle worth knowing: § 5322.01(D) defines "rental agreement" as a written agreement. An oral or handshake storage arrangement arguably falls outside Chapter 5322's lien altogether – we aren't resolving that for you, but a written agreement is worth confirming before you rely on the statute at all.
The day-counting question is unresolved on every one of these offsets, and we're not picking a side. Ohio has a general computation statute, R.C. 1.14, which excludes the first day and includes the last, and extends to the next business day if the last day is a Sunday or legal holiday – it probably governs a Chapter 5322 deadline, but whether it actually reaches a private lien deadline like this one hasn't been confirmed. Whether the ad may run on the pay-by day itself, or only the day after, is likewise unresolved in the statute's text. Build to the floor, and let counsel confirm the counting method before you rely on it.
The § 5322.03(B)(1) channels are: in person; certified mail; or first-class mail or a private delivery service, with a certificate or verification of mailing. 5322.03(B)(1) If you're arriving from the Texas or Illinois guides in this series, note this plainly: Ohio has no "verified mail" term at all. That's TX/IL vocabulary, and it does not appear as a channel here.
Here's the trap. The § 5322.03(D)(1) deemed-delivered-on-deposit presumption textually covers only "first-class mail or private delivery service with a certificate or verification of mailing." Certified mail is listed first among the (B)(1) channels – but it sits outside the (D)(1) presumption. Its delivery moment is simply unstated in the text. This inverts the usual assumption that certified mail is the safest, most defensible channel: in Ohio, the certificate-of-mailing channel gets the clean dispatch anchor, and certified mail doesn't.
We aren't resolving this for you. The conservative practice is to anchor certified-mail cases on the actual delivery date – not the deposit date – rather than assume the (D)(1) presumption reaches it. Counsel should reconcile the gap, including whether "certificate or verification of mailing" reaches USPS Form 3817 (Certificate of Mailing), carrier scan records, or both.
Email as a notice channel was added by H.B. 110 (eff. 9-30-2021) and then tightened by H.B. 321 (eff. 9-13-2022) into the rule that governs today. It is permitted only to the occupant – never to any other recipient class – and only if two conditions both hold. 5322.03(B)(2)
First, the occupant must have agreed to email notice and provided the address in the original rental agreement or a subsequent amendment. Second, the owner must send it in a way that establishes, with a response or return receipt, that the message was delivered to the occupant. Delivery is deemed to occur when the owner receives that response or return receipt – not on send, which is a contrast with the pre-2022 rule that deemed delivery on send. 5322.03(D)(2)
If delivery can't be established, the statute doesn't leave it to judgment: the owner shall use another (B)(1) delivery method. That's a mandatory fallback, not a discretionary one, and Day 0 of the whole timeline re-anchors to whenever that later delivery actually happens.
Ohio's notice goes to a statutory recipient set under § 5322.03(A). Three classes "shall be notified":
| Recipient class | Cite |
|---|---|
| Persons the owner has actual knowledge of who claim an interest in the property | 5322.03(A)(1) |
| Persons holding liens on any motor vehicle or watercraft among the stored property | 5322.03(A)(2) |
| Persons who have filed security agreements in the occupant's name with the Ohio Secretary of State or the county recorder – either the facility's county or the occupant's last-known-address Ohio county | 5322.03(A)(3) |
Two honest points worth surfacing. First, the occupant is not named in the (A) list at all – the occupant is reached only inferentially, as an (A)(1) person "claiming an interest," through (B)(2)'s "to the occupant," and through the (C) contents. We aren't asserting a settled fix; the safe build treats the occupant as a mandatory recipient regardless, but the reading itself is one counsel should confirm.
Second, unlike North Carolina – which expressly requires an online search – Ohio has no express duty to search for class (A)(3) filers. The statute keys on the fact that someone has filed, not on whether the owner knew about it, and § 5322.01(G)(2) defines a non-occupant's last known address as one "provided by" them "or discovered by" the owner – language that implies diligence without commanding it. That's a constructive-notice trap: miss a filed secured party and the sale is noncompliant as to them, even though you never had an express statutory duty to look. The practical build is a documented UCC search at the Ohio Secretary of State plus county recorder searches in both candidate counties, with dates and results recorded. How fresh those searches need to be, and whether pre-2013 county-level UCC filings still matter, are open questions for counsel.
Ohio requires one notice of the owner's claim, containing seven elements – two of them conditional. 5322.03(C)(1)–(7)
| Required element | Cite |
|---|---|
| The occupant's name and last known address | 5322.03(C)(1) |
| An itemized statement of the owner's claim: the sum due at the time of the notice, and the date that sum became due | 5322.03(C)(2) |
| A brief and general description of the property, reasonably adequate to identify it – except a locked, fastened, sealed, or tied container not opened by the owner before the notice date may be described as such, without describing its contents | 5322.03(C)(3) |
| (Conditional – if denial of access is permitted under the rental agreement) A notice of denial of access, with the name, street address, and phone number of a contact to pay the claim and either obtain the property or enter a new agreement | 5322.03(C)(4) |
| A demand for payment within a specified time, not less than ten days after delivery of the notice | 5322.03(C)(5) |
| A conspicuous statement that unless the claim is paid, the property will be advertised and sold by auction – and that if no one purchases it at the auction, it may be sold privately or destroyed (the destroy warning is Ohio-unique among this series) | 5322.03(C)(6) |
| (Conditional – if the sale will be held somewhere other than the facility) The street or internet address of the sale location | 5322.03(C)(7) |
Not in this notice – and a real contrast with Illinois: no sale date or time. H.B. 110 deleted "at a specified time and place" from (C)(6), effective 9-30-2021, so since then the notice does not fix the sale's date – unlike Illinois, where the notice must name the sale up front. There's also no SCRA or military-service statement anywhere in Chapter 5322 – any servicemember protection is federal overlay only – and no required redemption-rights statement; the (H) payment rights exist, but the statute doesn't require the notice to recite them.
That interacts with § 5322.03(E), which says the sale "shall conform to the terms of the notice." Since the notice states almost no sale terms anymore, the binding "terms" reduce to the claim amount, the property described, and the (C)(7) location if one is stated. We aren't resolving this for you, but it's worth flagging: voluntarily printing a sale date in the notice, even though the statute doesn't require it, arguably creates a conformity obligation under (E) that a later postponement would breach. Counsel should weigh in before an operator does that.
Storage unit auction rules in Ohio run on two co-equal channels, both dating from H.B. 247, effective 3-22-2013 – this is not a 2022-era change, despite how it's sometimes described. Either once a week for two consecutive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation in the facility's county, or "any other commercially reasonable manner." 5322.03(G) There is no no-newspaper posting fallback in Ohio, and none should be assumed – that's a contrast with Illinois's six-place posting fallback, which has no Ohio counterpart.
The safe harbor: the manner is deemed commercially reasonable if at least three independent bidders register for, view, or attend the sale – verbs modernized for online sales. "Independent" is undefined in the statute, and "view" is satisfiable by online lurkers who never bid – a thin safe harbor. Documentation of the channel, dates, and bidder count is the practical mitigation, not a statutory requirement, and we're not asserting the safe harbor is more solid than it reads.
Required ad contents run (G)(1)–(4): a brief and general description of the property; the occupant's name and last known address; the facility's street address; and the time, place, and manner of the sale. Two of those deserve emphasis. First, the ad must state the occupant's name and last known address – the most privacy-invasive advertisement requirement of the states in this series (Illinois requires name and unit number; Texas requires name only; North Carolina requires neither). It is statutorily non-omittable on the newspaper route, and the content list applies on the commercially-reasonable route too. Second, if the owner opened a locked container before the ad's publication date, the ad must describe its contents – a workflow coupling where the timing of the owner's own inspection changes what the ad has to say. 5322.03(G)(1) 5322.03(J)
The 15-day sale offset runs from "the first publication" – literal newspaper vocabulary. What that means on the commercially-reasonable route, where there's no native day count, is unstated. Our conservative reading treats the first ad appearance as "first publication" and holds the 15 days regardless of channel – but that's a cautious reading, not a resolved answer, and counsel should confirm it.
Day 0 below is the date the notice is delivered – not a rent-due date. Ohio sets no statutory minimum delinquency period before the notice may issue: enforcement opens at "a claim that has become due," and the rental agreement governs when that is. 5322.03
The lien is not effective against a valid security interest in a motor vehicle or watercraft – even if that interest was never filed. 5322.02(A)(1) A secured party or lienholder who presents proof may immediately remove the unit without paying anything toward the lien. 5322.03(H)(1) The statutory exit for titled property is a discretionary tow – 30 days after notice to identified lienholders, or 60 days unpaid with none identified, or alongside a sale of co-stored goods, before or after that sale – with the towing service or storage facility named in the lienholder notice. 5322.03(K) Chapter 5322 says nothing about how an auction buyer would get an Ohio certificate of title. Trailers appear only in the tow provision, so a trailer's sale status is doubly unclear. We gate all three property types out.
A bold or underlined rental-agreement clause capping the value of stored property becomes the deemed maximum value of that property – but the cap may not be set below $1,000, the occupant may raise it with the owner's written permission, and there's no limit on claims for the owner's own negligence. 5322.06 This section was enacted by H.B. 33, effective 10-3-2023 – leases signed before that date may simply lack the clause.
A late fee must be stated in the rental agreement or an addendum, and there's no late fee at all if rent is paid in full by the third day after the due date. 5322.05 The safe harbor is the greater of $20 or 20% of the late payment – a floor for what's presumptively reasonable, not a ceiling. An owner can charge more, but then carries the burden of proving it's reasonable.
The owner loses the lien on property they "voluntarily permit to be removed" from the facility – the familiar relinquishment trap – or "unjustifiably refuse to permit to be removed." 5322.02(B) That second arm is Ohio-specific: over-enforcing, by refusing a removal that was actually justified (a vehicle secured party under (H)(1), or a paid-up occupant under (H)), also kills the lien. Denial of access has to be lease-authorized and disclosed under (C)(4) before it's safe to exercise.
The owner may buy at the sale. 5322.03(M) But an owner or an owner's agent is specifically excluded from the good-faith-purchaser protection that shields other buyers from an owner's noncompliance. 5322.03(I)(2) A compliant owner's liability is otherwise capped at the balance of the sale proceeds – but that cap evaporates on noncompliance, and a willful violation is conversion. 5322.03(O) An owner buy-in deserves extra compliance certainty, not less.
There's no SCRA text anywhere in Chapter 5322. Protection for an active servicemember comes from federal law on its own force – 50 U.S.C. § 3901 et seq. – and 50 U.S.C. § 3958 generally requires a court order before an owner can foreclose on a servicemember's stored property.
A pending bill, covered in full above, would stretch the 10-day demand to 90 days and expand owner liability. It is not law as of this writing. If you're relying on this guide on an ongoing basis, recheck the bill's status – the 136th General Assembly runs through 2026.
A good-faith purchaser at the sale takes free of the owner's noncompliance – except an owner or an owner's agent, who does not get that protection. 5322.03(I)(2) The owner satisfies the lien out of the proceeds, then mails any balance to the occupant's last known mailing address, by certified mail or by first-class mail or private delivery service with a certificate of mailing. 5322.03(L)
If that mailing is returned, or the address is unknown, the balance is held for two years. After that, it becomes unclaimed funds under R.C. 169.01(B) and goes to the state under Chapter 169. That's a real contrast with Illinois, where an unclaimed balance becomes the owner's own property after just one year – in Ohio it escheats to the state instead.
If no one purchases the property at the auction, the owner may re-advertise and sell it, sell it privately, or destroy it. 5322.03(P) Liability for noncompliance is damages, with conversion for a willful violation. 5322.03(O)
LienFlow tracks these deadlines and generates the notice for you to review and file – $49/mo when your state launches.
Reserve your spotThis guide is built from the complete operative text of Ohio Revised Code §§ 5322.01–5322.06 – all six sections – pulled on 12 August 2026 directly from the official Ohio Revised Code at codes.ohio.gov, the Legislative Service Commission's site, which publishes authenticated per-section PDFs and full version histories. Prior versions of the amended sections – H.B. 247, effective 3-22-2013; H.B. 110, effective 9-30-2021; H.B. 321, effective 9-13-2022 – were pulled from the same source and machine-diffed against the current text to attribute each amendment. Section 5322.06 was enacted, and § 5322.01's lead-in conformed, by H.B. 33, effective 10-3-2023. No version of any Chapter 5322 section exists after that date. The pending S.B. 283 as-introduced text was pulled from the General Assembly's official LIS document API.
The honest gaps: codes.ohio.gov could lag a very recent enactment, though none was observed. The R.C. 1.14 computation overlay, and Ohio's UETA (R.C. Chapter 1306, relevant to whether a click-through or emailed rental agreement satisfies the written-agreement definition), were identified but not researched. No case-law pass was run, and the recipient-set occupant quirk, the meaning of "unjustifiably refuses," and the meaning of "independent bidders" all want cases before they're settled. This page has not been reviewed by a licensed Ohio attorney. Written 12 August 2026.